GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics

» GC Stats
Members: 333,291
Threads: 115,749
Posts: 2,208,681
Welcome to our newest member, zaashleytivaov9
» Online Users: 2,766
0 members and 2,766 guests
No Members online
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-14-2007, 04:59 PM
jwright25 jwright25 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 507
Quote:
Originally Posted by MysticCat View Post
Snopes seems to be leaning heavily toward political trick.

That said, there's a lot about it (including the notable absence of the Reagans) that makes me more than willing to sell my castle to anyone who thinks this thing is for real.
I was kinda thinking that too. Even though there are other "recollections" out there that more or less imply the same observations about these individuals, the thing that I question most would be that a current or former Secret Service agent would freely discuss these things. I guess it just seems to me that part of their "oath of office" would be that they never reveal anything about the people they are protecting or things they have seen.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-14-2007, 06:24 PM
PeppyGPhiB PeppyGPhiB is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Emerald City
Posts: 3,416
Quote:
Originally Posted by jwright25 View Post
I was kinda thinking that too. Even though there are other "recollections" out there that more or less imply the same observations about these individuals, the thing that I question most would be that a current or former Secret Service agent would freely discuss these things. I guess it just seems to me that part of their "oath of office" would be that they never reveal anything about the people they are protecting or things they have seen.
Not to mention that it's not like the SAME secret service personnel protect each President and his family. For something like this to be true, me thinks you'd have to get a lot of SS folks on the protection detail to talk. It seems like an obvious ploy by the Republican party to paint Republicans as good and Democrats as bad, thereby helping whomever gets the GOP nomination.
__________________
Gamma Phi Beta
Love. Labor. Learning. Loyalty.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Brother Ron Paul eli_the_chopper Lambda Chi Alpha 37 01-01-2009 01:15 PM
Sir Paul turns 64... DeltAlum Entertainment 4 06-16-2006 08:38 PM
Paul Van Dyk cashmoney Chit Chat 40 08-19-2005 04:58 PM
Paul Hamm cutiepatootie Entertainment 31 08-31-2004 11:31 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.