YES!! I have my Harry Potter book **SPOILERS ABOUND!!!***

lovelyivy84 · #1 07-25-2007, 10:15 AM

So the reprieved indiviudal has been revealed- it was Mr. Weasley!

He was originally going to die in book 5! I am so happy he didn't. I think it would have broken my heart and added unnecessary drama.

MysticCat · #2 07-25-2007, 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lovelyivy84

So the reprieved indiviudal has been revealed- it was Mr. Weasley! He was originally going to die in book 5!

Ack!!! Where did you read that?

Drolefille · #3 07-25-2007, 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MysticCat

Ack!!! Where did you read that?

What he said!

MysticCat · #4 07-25-2007, 11:21 AM

^^^^ Found it here at MSNBC. Other info there as well.

Drolefille · #5 07-25-2007, 11:35 AM

From the story: She will "probably" publish some sort of encyclopedia giving us history and back stories as well as more information about what happened between the last chapter and the epilogue.

McGonagall is NOT headmistress, Harry is not the DADA professor, although the position isn't jinxed anymore. Arthur was saved at the cost of another father in Book 7 - Ted Tonks? Lupin? Am I forgetting someone obvious?

And don't hold your breath for the encyclopedia.

polarpi · #6 07-25-2007, 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Drolefille

Arthur was saved at the cost of another father in Book 7 - Ted Tonks? Lupin? Am I forgetting someone obvious?

Since the sentence inthe article says "another father dies in the end of Book 7" (italics added), I say it was Lupin.

If we get an encyclopedia, great - but I can understand her need for a break!

Drolefille · #7 07-25-2007, 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by polarpi

Since the sentence inthe article says "another father dies in the end of Book 7" (italics added), I say it was Lupin.

If we get an encyclopedia, great - but I can understand her need for a break!

Lupin was my first guess, I just blanked "the end" bit. Although honestly I knew from the godfather moment that Lupin and Tonks were dead. Though I was trying to figure out how they'd put a baby with a 17 year old. Sure he's of age, but that just wouldn't work.