Quote:
Originally Posted by blackngoldengrl
If she's going to sue for a failed medical procedure, then fine. BUT for the cost of raising a child that she could have given away?? Unacceptable.
|
I agree. However, if Planned Parenthood specifically states that the abortion procedure is not 100% effective (in terms of ending a pregnancy) then I don't see how they are liable. If that was the case, then why shouldn't couples who are seeking IVF and do not successfully conceive be reimbursed? Are they not paying money for a procedure that does not guarentee a particular outcome? This case sets a very unsettleing precendent which is why I think it will get tossed out of court.
But honestly, I think this lady is full of it. I think she did have an abortion (probably a D&C), but got pregnant again soon afterwards and is now looking for a way to make some $$$.
That poor kid! It's one thing to unplanned (I'm sure many of us are
) but its quite another thing to have it plastered all over the news and in court.
Hybrid Mode
