Quote:
Originally Posted by DeltaBetaBaby
Interesting segment...they harped a lot on the concealing of DNA found in her panties that did not belong to any of the accused. While the prosecutor did some un-ethical things, that was not one of them. AFAIK, the sexual history of a victim is not supposed to be relevant (though I don't know the specific law in NC).
|
While her sexual history is not relevant but since she had orginally claimed prior to being raped she had had no sexual contact for over a week. It has been reported here locally that the DA was required to turn over any info that would point to the boys' innocence and that would have clearly pointed to someone else. And also NC doesn't really have any real rape shield law. I'm sure they have something but not anything like the one in Colorado.
Threaded Mode