2006 College Football

[shinerbock]

Starang, I have no idea how you'd do it. Some sort of playoff is the solution. The only thing I'm saying is that the old system is sometimes better at recognizing teams than is the current system. Where we go from here, I don't know.

I think when we get to a playoff, we scrap the current BCS bowl system. Keep the Orange, the Sugar, and the Rose. Say there is an 8 team playoff. I think you you could do a few things. You could reward the higher teams with homefield advantage in the first round. You could use a regional system, playing a neutral site (but destroying the 1 vs. 8, 2 vs. 7 matchups). Its tough, people need to understand that if we're really gonna make this fair, some tradition is gonna have to be altered, and you might have a tough time seeing every game your team is playing in in person. However, if you the first 4 games at non-bowl sites, then you could have a rotating schedule of the final three games between the rose, sugar, and the orange.

I still think an 8 team playoff with 6 automatic bids for conference champions is the way to go. In actuality, I'd prefer it just be automatic bids, but I don't know how you could do that. That way, the solution is easy. Win your conference. Thats one of the reasons I don't care that Michigan got left out. They had a chance 3 weeks ago to get into the national championship game. They lost.

[PM_Mama00]

I'm in favor of giving OSU the National title and having Michigan and UF duke it out for 2nd. Even if UF beats OSU, OSU will still be the better team anyways. If there were a rematch, and Michigan won, OSU would still be the better team.

[macallan25]

That makes zero sense.

How do you say if OSU loses to Florida......then they are the better team? That is ridiculous. I heard that same thing after we won the Rose Bowl last year. "Well.....USC is still better." That is complete crap. If Michigan played Ohio State again, this time in Michigan, and won.....it doesn't say anything.

[SigKapSweetie]

Originally Posted by macallan25

That makes zero sense.

How do you say if OSU loses to Florida......then they are the better team?

Agreed.

I'm always puzzled by people who insists that, whether a team wins or loses, they're still the better team. Judging by what? Clearly not by their ability to beat the other team.

[jojapeach]

Originally Posted by SigKapSweetie

Agreed.

I'm always puzzled by people who insists that, whether a team wins or loses, they're still the better team. Judging by what? Clearly not by their ability to beat the other team.

LOL

I don't see how Michigan folks can still realistically be angry. Your team was 11-1 without a conference championship. UF had to continue playing, and ultimately won their conference which lead to 12-1. Please...get over yourselves.

The BCS does suck overall. I think the playoff scenario would be a plausible solution. Although every single fan of a playoff team couldn't afford to travel to a final championship game, there are thousands of alumni they could definitely afford two trips in one day. *I'm surely not one of them!* Something has to be sacrificed to get a better system that fairly deterlmines the true national champion.

LOL @ fuckeyes

[docetboy]

Have I mentioned yet that I have my tickets (20yl) to the Cotton Bowl and hotel reservation made for Dallas?

Go Big Red!

[Kevin]

Originally Posted by docetboy

Have I mentioned yet that I have my tickets (20yl) to the Cotton Bowl and hotel reservation made for Dallas?

Go Big Red!

The best advice you'll ever get about the Cotton Bowl -- take a taxi there, make arrangements for one to pick you up. You don't want to park your car (or even have to walk around) in that neighborhood.

[ufdale]

So what's up with UCF voting for Michigan and not for Florida?! wtf? They were the only ones we played who didn't vote for UF. losers

How do coaches get to vote in the coaches poll?