2006 College Football

[macallan25]

Originally Posted by greekalum

Still stand by this?

USC hasn't looked very good at all this year....so I would still pay to see Auburn USC for sure.

[greekalum]

Perhaps, but they looked a lot better than Auburn vs. Arkansas.

[amycat412]

OK I am a USC alum and I'll agree with both what macallan AND greekalum said. Still, a girl can hold out hope for LUCK to stand by her team and/or for that legendary Pete Carroll late season strength to kick in soon!

[shinerbock]

I'm sure they did, and Auburn looked a lot better against WSU than USC did. Auburn also looked better defensively in a win against LSU than USC has in any game this year. Granted, I'm not saying we couldnt/wouldnt lose to USC, we might, but I think Auburn playing well could very reasonably beat USC.

That being said, I think if AU doesn't make some serious changes this year, Auburn may be a lesser top 25 team when the years done. The talent is there, the coaches just aren't making good use of it. I think our focus has been too much on survival and the future, and we're not getting our best players on the field. Hopefully bringing in Tray Blackmon and Ben Tate this weekend will spark the team a little.

[KSig RC]

Originally Posted by amycat412

OK I am a USC alum and I'll agree with both what macallan AND greekalum said. Still, a girl can hold out hope for LUCK to stand by her team and/or for that legendary Pete Carroll late season strength to kick in soon!

I'm pretty sure the "legendary Pete Carroll"-ness was found in the offseason, and will have to be scaled back to prevent scholarship sanctions in the offseason.

-RC
--What I'm saying is, your boy's a cheater, sorry Amy!