Your thoughts on AI: discussion goes here.

[UGAalum94]

You all seem to simultaneously arguing two mutually exclusive lines of reasoning: A) only information from a GLO’s website should be available at GreekChat AND B) If it’s on the group’s website, there’s no reason for it to be online elsewhere. What would that leave to be discussed on Greek Chat?

Really, you all are too much.

[valkyrie]

Originally Posted by Alphagamuga

You all seem to simultaneously arguing two mutually exclusive lines of reasoning: A) only information from a GLO’s website should be available at GreekChat AND B) If it’s on the group’s website, there’s no reason for it to be online elsewhere. What would that leave to be discussed on Greek Chat?

Really, you all are too much.

Well, that would leave the 900,000,000 other things that are discussed on GC.

[UGAalum94]

If you weren't allowed to discuss anything that wasn't on the webpage, and you weren't allowed to discuss anything on the webpage, that would leave nothing that could be discussed.

Unless you admit that you are applying a standard to AI discussions that you wouldn't apply to other topics.

[Jen]

Originally Posted by Alphagamuga

If you weren't allowed to discuss anything that wasn't on the webpage, and you weren't allowed to discuss anything on the webpage, that would leave nothing that could be discussed.

Unless you admit that you are applying a standard to AI discussions that you wouldn't apply to other topics.

AI isn't other topics. It's its own monster.

[Tippiechick]

Originally Posted by Alphagamuga

You all seem to simultaneously arguing two mutually exclusive lines of reasoning: A) only information from a GLO’s website should be available at GreekChat AND B) If it’s on the group’s website, there’s no reason for it to be online elsewhere. What would that leave to be discussed on Greek Chat?

Really, you all are too much.

Why do you almost always go back and edit your posts? I have noticed a trend of this happening and think it is very odd. Care to explain?

[UGAalum94]

Usually it's to correct typos that I didn't notice until later when I see them quoted in other people's comments.

In this instance, I did delete a comment that in hindsight I realized was unnecessarily speculative about peoples attitude and motives in wanting to shut down the AI forum.

This is the only instance for which I think the content was really changed. Usually, it's because I've typed d instead of s and stuff like that.

Should I not fix the errors?

[Tippiechick]

Originally Posted by Alphagamuga

Usually it's to correct typos that I didn't notice until later when I see them quoted in other people's comments.

In this instance, I did delete a comment that in hindsight I realized was unnecessarily speculative about peoples attitude and motives in wanting to shut down the AI forum.

This is the only instance for which I think the content was really changed. Usually, it's because I've typed d instead of s and stuff like that.

Should I not fix the errors?

It just seems odd that you go back and edit so many of them.

[James]

I'm thankful she does. It makes it easier to read her posts. I wish more people would do it. In fact I should do it more myself, especially when posting at 5am.

Originally Posted by Tippiechick

It just seems odd that you go back and edit so many of them.