HIV testing - A standard part of your yearly physical

[AlphaFrog]

Originally Posted by OtterXO

All of us are merely pointing out that citing your Natural Resouces class as the source of all information on this topic is a little sketchy.

I don't even have a problem with him stating "This is what we discussed in my Natural Resources class...", it's the fact that he tried to use the inverse and say "Well, since we never discussed this, it couldn't have possibly happened...". I took a Marine Geology class, and we never discussed the fact that water was wet, but I'm pretty sure that it is, despite never having covered that in the Marine Geology class.

[OtterXO]

Originally Posted by AlphaFrog

I don't even have a problem with him stating "This is what we discussed in my Natural Resources class...", it's the fact that he tried to use the inverse and say "Well, since we never discussed this, it couldn't have possibly happened...". I took a Marine Geology class, and we never discussed the fact that water was wet, but I'm pretty sure that it is, despite never having covered that in the Marine Geology class.

You stated that better than I did.

[Langox510x]

Originally Posted by AlphaFrog

I don't even have a problem with him stating "This is what we discussed in my Natural Resources class...", it's the fact that he tried to use the inverse and say "Well, since we never discussed this, it couldn't have possibly happened...". I took a Marine Geology class, and we never discussed the fact that water was wet, but I'm pretty sure that it is, despite never having covered that in the Marine Geology class.

I never ment that in any way, what I mean is that threw "logical reason" I have concluded this to be BS. Now what you need to do is at the least prove me wrong with some sources!!! Oh, and in this case because of the nature of the subjefct if this isn't on MSNBC, BBC, or mdia along that lines it probubly isn't true.

Originally Posted by AlphaFrog

So the X-files is a reliable source...as well as your Natural Resources class. And if it's not discussed in your Natural Resources class, then it doesn't exist until someone proves it does by citing C-SPAN??? Ok, I understand now.

Ok, you get no points for overlooking the sarcasm. I'm not the one who came up with this loony theory, I'm the one whos asking if you can back it up with reliable sources, sources such as those a professor would ask for in college. Can you handle that??

[OtterXO]

Originally Posted by Langox510x

I never ment that in any way, what I mean is that threw "logical reason" I have concluded this to be BS. Now what you need to do is at the least prove me wrong with some sources!!! Oh, and in this case because of the nature of the subjefct if this isn't on MSNBC, BBC, or mdia along that lines it probubly isn't true.

Ok, you get no points for overlooking the sarcasm. I'm not the one who came up with this loony theory, I'm the one whos asking if you can back it up with reliable sources, sources such as those a professor would ask for in college. Can you handle that??

No, what you said was

Why haven't I even heard this stated as a theory in my Natural Resources class??

and we're simply pointing out the FLAW in your "logic".

Also, the sarcasm bus missed one passenger in this thread and it certainly wasn't AlphaFrog.

[AlphaFrog]

Originally Posted by Langox510x

threw "logical reason" I have concluded this to be BS.

It's hard to accept "logical reasoning" from someone who doesn't even know the difference between "threw" and "through".

Originally Posted by Langox510x

Now what you need to do is at the least prove me wrong with some sources!!! Oh, and in this case because of the nature of the subjefct if this isn't on MSNBC, BBC, or mdia along that lines it probubly isn't true.

Why should I bother to prove you wrong with sources, when you have yet to cite sources to prove your initial point? And once again, you can't "negatively prove" yourself by saying "if the information is not there, it must not be true". That completely backwards thinking and false reasoning. I might not be able to find a source on MSNBC that says the Earth revolves around the sun, but that doesn't mean that it's not true.

[Langox510x]

Originally Posted by AlphaFrog

It's hard to accept "logical reasoning" from someone who doesn't even know the difference between "threw" and "through".



Why should I bother to prove you wrong with sources, when you have yet to cite sources to prove your initial point? And once again, you can't "negatively prove" yourself by saying "if the information is not there, it must not be true". That completely backwards thinking and false reasoning. I might not be able to find a source on MSNBC that says the Earth revolves around the sun, but that doesn't mean that it's not true.

Well were sure going round in circles here. How can I prove something wrong when nothing has really even been written on it?? You wanna know why nobody is writing anything that is actually worth a damn?? Because it's BS!!

I'm going to try and stay away from this thread because listening to this crap is only making me stupid.

[GeekyPenguin]

Originally Posted by Langox510x

Well were sure going round in circles here. How can I prove something wrong when nothing has really even been written on it?? You wanna know why nobody is writing anything that is actually worth a damn?? Because it's BS!!

I'm going to try and stay away from this thread because listening to this crap is only making me stupid.

I think you did that all by yourself, stupid.

[AlphaFrog]

Originally Posted by Langox510x

I'm going to try and stay away from this thread because listening to this crap is only making me stupid.

And god knows you can't afford to get any stupider. If you did, you might start drooling on yourself.


(Ok, I know that was low...but I can only take so much).

[Rudey]

They should just move all people with AIDS into one neighborhood instead so that they can have sex and share needles without worrying about spreading it.

-Rudey
--So insensitive.

[Eggroll]

Originally Posted by Rudey

They should just move all people with AIDS into one neighborhood instead so that they can have sex and share needles without worrying about spreading it.

-Rudey
--So insensitive.

AHHHHHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!