Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DeltAlum
Here's a theory. No basis in known fact on my part.
Maybe the real reason the US isn't demanding a cease fire is that we will support Israel (as our surrogate) in striking Iran (and maybe Syria) under the theme that they are supplying Hezbollah.
We give Israel lots of equipment, and they do our dirty work.
I'm not sure that would be wise, but...
As I said, just a theory.
|
Well...
the countries that have said they want a cease fire, haven't done anything to back that up.
For example, none have dedicated peace keeping troops but keep discussing it. Germany said they'd get involved only if Hezbollah invites them in and a bunch of other conditions are met - essentially if those conditions are met there wouldn't be a need for any troops since there wouldn't be a war. The same goes for France and America since they don't want to dedicate troops there. Britain has said it's stretched out as well.
At the same time, the majority of the Arab world is Sunni and against the Iranians and Hezbollah so they want to see Hezbollah weakened. That's why they've condemned Hezbollah and really just played PR games with their own people and the news, but nothing more.
Really it's Russia, Syria, Iran, and Lebanon here against everyone else. Russia supplies weapons to Syria and Iran and those two then supply weapons and money to terrorists in Lebanon.
So what is the point of a ceasefire? Israel has blocked Lebanon off so it's harder to send in weapons, has been attacked by several thousand rockets, destroyed another several thousand rockets, and is letting the world know that status quo is unacceptable. Why would anyone want the cease fire? They have come to accept that same conclusion.
-Rudey