Quote:
Originally posted by irishpipes
The same could be said about the posts on this thread towards him. I didn't know that only non-Christians were allowed to have opinions - I mean judgments.
I am not trying to defend this guy. I don't know him, and I don't care to know him. It just seems that some on this thread are more upset by his politics and religious beliefs than his article. I am offended that he wrote something that was offensive about GLOs, of which I am a member. Would I be less offended if he were an atheist liberal?
|
You're missing the point entirely. Where is anyone critical of him BECAUSE he is a Christian? Who is upset by his politics or religious beliefs? Who would be less offended if he were an atheist?
Again, I shared the links and information I found out about him in response to an earlier post saying he was a hippy liberal. He is not a hippy liberal. Presenting evidence is not the same thing as making some sort of assertion that only non-Christians are allowed to have opinions. That doesn't even make sense.
Threaded Mode