Quote:
Originally posted by ADPiZXalum
Even if she did use citations, she would probably still be ripped apart by those who don't agree, so what's the point? They would immediately be dismissed as false or random or whatever else.
|
Holy crap this is getting ugly . . . let's try it in the simplest possible fashion:
THE POINTS SHE'S MAKING CAN ONLY BE ACCEPTED AS TRUE OR 'WHATEVER ELSE' IF SHE PROVIDES CITATIONS AND SHOWS AN UNDERSTANDING OF CONTEXT, TO PROVE THE QUOTATIONS ARE NOT FALSE, RANDOM, OR WHATEVER ELSE.
Side note: how on Earth can Evangelical or Fundamentalist Christians, the most OVERREPRESENTED group in the USA (possibly second, to the elderly), act like everyone's "out to get them"? Mind-bending.
Threaded Mode