Quote:
Originally posted by Shortfuse
KTSNAKE, I would agree that it takes along time before History shows us who was right or wrong. I also agree that Saddam would ahve to be dealt with sooner or later. But it's the manner we dealt with him.
|
That's what I'm saying though. That's the Bush doctrine. If you agree that we were going to have to go in anyway because of WMD's, your issue is not with the lack of WMD's, it's with his preemptive approach to threats against the United States.
You are admitting here that you do agree that Iraq would have certainly eventually have become a threat to the US that we would have had to deal with.
Now, which would you have rather fought? An Iraq with weaponized WMD's? Or one that was only stockpiling resources to be able to have weaponized WMD?
For me, and I think most Americans, the choice is clear.
Threaded Mode