Quote:
Originally posted by ktsnake
Just to be fair...
Remember that the commission also stated that Saddamm kept the money and intellectual resources stockpiled and planned to restart the programs ASAP.
So, even if they weren't in full effect when we invaded, they would have been at a later point. So, which is worse, invading once it had started or invading before they started?
I say the later.
|
If that was the case I take it we should be bombing Iran and N.Korea now.
Yes I am being fair, raging a war based on what you "think could" happen isn't a justifiable excuse. It just isn't and there is no way a person can say it is. Dude even if Iraq had these WMDs, how do you expect him to get it here? Iraq was NEVER a threat to US security.
As I said once and I'll say it again, the last few attacks on American soil or against American soldiers during peacetime did not come from Iraqis. Saddam was just blowing hot air up our azzez. It's like punching a 90 year old woman in the face because she threaten the kick your azz.
Threaded Mode