Quote:
Originally posted by kappaloo
It is not so much that the Natives were armed, but that Dudley George was shot - unarmed - in the back.
I'm from London, and it was huge news around here.
|
That's the issue here yes.
But the OPP are justifying opening fire because they said that some of them were armed.
The natives are saying no one was armed.
We know Dudley George wasn't armed, so why was he shot? Were some of the natives armed and he accidently got in the way?
Threaded Mode