Quote:
Originally posted by RACooper
Alright then I will 
I read through resolution 1441 and I didn't see anything that stated that a breach of the resolution would mean the use of armed force... in order for that to happen there had to be a vote in favour of this course of action. The US didn't bring an amendment or new resolution calling for the use of armed force against Iraq, therefore the action was not legally sanctioned by the UN.
|
Exactly what do you think "Serious Consequences" meant? I don't think anyone was surprised that the interpretation of the US was that it meant military action.
__________________
SN -SINCE 1869-
"EXCELLING WITH HONOR"
S N E T T
Mu Tau 5, Central Oklahoma
|
Threaded Mode