GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 332,824
Threads: 115,742
Posts: 2,208,465
Welcome to our newest member, luisteaxdo3865
» Online Users: 2,587
2 members and 2,585 guests
JayhawkAOII, John
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 06-06-2004, 12:29 PM
AGDee AGDee is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 15,863
Although some are saying that there is no argument for if a woman's life is in danger, this law did not make allowances for this possibility.

As for the second scenario I posed, I probably wasn't clear that they thought that if they did a c-section, they didn't think this girl's uterus would ever develop properly. This was also in 1989, when babies weren't surviving at 23 weeks. I did an internship in a NICU in 1987 and was told then that survival wasn't possible until 28 weeks or so. Medical technology has advanced a lot since then.

The hydrocephaly website I posted above says that they only take out the fluid, not the brain, if that makes a difference to anybody.

This is some information from a website that details fetal development. This section is the 23 week description.

If your baby were to be born now, she would still have a good chance of survival (about 85 percent) with the right care. Advances in science and technology now mean that a 24-week-old baby can grow outside the womb if necessary, although about 50 percent of children in this situation will have some severe and permanent damage.

Dee
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.