Quote:
Originally posted by Peaches-n-Cream
I can understand krazy's point. You shouldn't have to compromise your values to have a career. I am sure that their are other pharmacists who have a problem with this drug. What are they supposed to do?
I don't think that this situation has dragged Eckerd's name through the mud. It might spark an interesting debate on morality and religious values in the workforce. I do think that it is controversial that he was fired rather than placed in a position in which his religious beliefs weren't compromised. I actually think that Eckerd's reaction is going to be a big problem for them in the future.
|
Wht kind of position do you think the pharmacists could be placed in so they wouldn't be in a position to possible compromise their moral/religious/ethical beliefs?
Threaded Mode