Quote:
Originally posted by russellwarshay
No, its just that the casualty rate was so incredibly low that it was easier to have more casualties after the conflict then during it. Bumper sticker slogans are a poor substitute for rational analysis.
|
what on earth does this mean? if we lost a lot of soldiers during the war, does that lessen the impact of the high number of soldiers who lost their lives after the war? is this a numbers game to the republicans?
"well, we lost so few soldiers while we were fighting, we can afford to make up for it afterwards."
what kind of bullshit is that?
Threaded Mode