scpiano.. I don't know about your argument here. I personally don't see how the two things are in the same boat.
The examples you are providing are documentaries. Yes, they were created to make money but they are based on events that actually occured. The purpose was two-fold. To make money is of course tops.. but the second purpose was to inform. I think the second purpose, informing people of the horrible things that have happened in our past serves a legitimate purpose.
Something tells me that the fellas that did this didn't have that same legitimate purpose in mind
Now I'll maintain the argument that I had a few months ago when this thread originally came up. It's horrible what they did, I think that KS should do something about it. But as far as a PUBLIC institution deciding what statements are acceptable for an organization to make... that's a road I'd rather not see taken.