Quote:
Originally posted by DoggyStyle82:
Like I posted earlier, private orgs can discriminate. Does your chapter accept the campus slut? Does your alumni chapter accept the town hoe? A girl known to get drunk and act a fool in public. A thugged out girl with mannish ways? A butch bull-dyke who rides harleys and chews tobacco?. I think that AKA would have a problem with any of them wearing para or representing your org to the public. But who are you to judge? If all of these women have the grades and great public service records, why judge WHO they are and HOW they lead their lives. If homosexuality is equal or on par with heterosexuality, why is not promiscuity as equally a viable lifestyle as chastity or monagamy? Drunkeness with sobriety? Bull-dyke with Finer Womanhood? [/B]
|
Excellent point! Why hasn't any of the Pro Gay activists responded to it?
I think using quotes from
the bible to support your pro
homosexual stance is the best example of an oxymororn i've ever seen. What an abomination, how very hypocritical!
So, I guess if I wanted to join a sorority the fact that I live a promiscuous lifestyle (I don't, i'm saying this for arguments sake)wouldn't be an issue right? What if I enjoy smoking weed and drinking? According to you guys, it wouldn't be an issue because the members of the sorority would not have the right to judge the lifestyle that I live.
That's all I have to stay and I'm out!
Threaded Mode