Okay,
I need to say something here. I had a friend who dated this guy who beat the sh!t out of her. I begged her to leave him, but she said that he was only teaching her to be stronger. Okay, how is that any different from some of the stuff I've read stated on this thread. No one who loves you or who is down with you beats you. Nobody who's family loves them does that. My Sorority is my family, so they build me up in positive and reaffirming ways, they don't tear me down, or claim to build me up by beating me down.
Just like women who get beaten, and make every excuse in the book for it. This sounds the same.
And, as far as I'm concerned the concept of paper is fine, but when someone uses it because someone in a Frat or Sorority gets the house in trouble due to hazing that's ridiculous. The people who beat the sh!t out of their frat or sisters should be the ones called paper, cause I don't think that any of the principles which an organization stands for would condone beating. And if they did, why would one chose to stand for that?
In my Opinion,
Kymberleigh
[This message has been edited by Kymberleigh (edited August 11, 2000).]
|
Threaded Mode