Quote:
Originally Posted by DeltaBetaBaby
And I'm saying it's got nothing to do with "disdain." As soon as NALFO groups start stealing an appreciable number of women from NPC groups, it will benefit NPC groups to form an agreement with NALFO. Until then, we can argue all we want about lifetime commitments, but that's not the driving factor for the NPC UA and it won't be enough to make a rule about not pledging former members of NALFO groups.
|
It has to do with disregard or apathy. That's the point.
NPHC GLOs such as Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc. didn't start prohibiting women who are members of NPC sororities because of a huge amount of Black women joining predominantly white sororities. Please believe it. It stemmed from a very small but noticeable trend of Black women using NPC sororities to get to Delta over the years. This warranted a national policy that includes NPHC and NPC. Individual chapters of Delta continue to expand the national policy to include MCGLO, LGLO, AGLO, BGLO sororities based on the lifetime commitment of other GLOs at their school or in their city.
Threaded Mode
