Quote:
Originally Posted by 33girl
I don't think QAs would exist, unless they know they have a sister living out for a reason (RA, study abroad, etc).
|
Well, that's what I thought, but then there was some discussion upthread:
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbear19
Out of curiosity, though, would it really matter if those women who voluntarily dropped stuck it out? In a campus with flexible quota, quota would just be a whole lot higher if all the voluntary-droppers didn't drop. But at IU, wouldn't that mean there would be just that many more women who didn't get matched in the end?
I don't mean to be argumentative!! It just seems like the way this system is, we really can't fault the girls who drop out early, because ultimately quota wouldn't be any bigger than it is.
|
^^ This is how I understood it before, but then...
Quote:
Originally Posted by IndianaSigKap
Yes, I believe it would make a difference. We all know so many things change during preference, if these women would stick it out I think they would grow to like one or more of those chapter they think they are too good for at the time. IU does use quota additions. So more women can be placed in the system with quota additions. They chapters who allow live outs can take QAs.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverRoses
Quota this past year ranged from 35-70; actual pledge classes ranged from 37-84 (so you can see that QAs do happen).
|
So is it only the unhoused chapters and the ones that allow live-outs that have QA's? Can they take an unlimited amount?
But even the ones that allow live-outs...the new members wouldn't be the live-outs, so they'd still have to have an EXACT number that would be in the PC, right? So, then true QA's wouldn't really exist?
So confused, just trying to understand.
Threaded Mode
