Quote:
Originally Posted by KSig RC
Troll harder, brother ... although the thick air of anti-"intellectualism" as a hand-wave to counterarguments is just awesome though, so thanks for that.
If you don't know why Sliippery Slope is often considered a logical fallacy (or, at the least, poor form in an argument without the corresponding justification of the warrant), I'll point you here. |
Interesting that when you disagree with someone you resort to name calling. Typical.
Let me make sure I understand you my "Kappa Sigma brother". Someone who disagrees with a you and/or other liberals is labeled an "anti-intellectual"? Have you ever considered that it just might be the other way around? It's the "intellectuals" like you who desire an "anything goes society" that will push us or maybe even drag us right over the cliff and down the slope.
Try a better source next time than an article in Wikipedia that has numerous issues with it and no citations. How one can examine a specious article like the one referenced and say that this proves their point is beyond me. BTW - Kind of neat that you were able to click "anti-intellectualism" within the article for an immediate buzz word to use as part of your attack. It was really quite lazy of you.
As our society continues its rapid decay many of us "anti-intellectuals" will lean back and say "I told you so" but, as history has shown us time and again, it may just be too late. I hope not.
"I have spoken my piece and counted to three". Penny Wharvey McGill.
Threaded Mode
