Quote:
Originally Posted by badnews_bear
Please feel free to give me your feedback and check out the article:
|
Is there a point somewhere in the article? If there is, I cannot find it. In one place, you say that it's "not fair" to put together a list of the "best" sororities and/or fraternities, yet elsewhere you seem to defend just such lists. A response like this needs to present a cogent argument for the position you're taking. This article does not do that.
As for this sentence --
Quote:
|
It is not fair to compile a national list of the best sororities and fraternities because each chapter is very unique.
|
-- there is no such thing as "very unique." A chapter is either unique -- meaning it is one of a kind and there is no other chapter like it anywhere -- or it is not. There are no levels of uniqueness. /petpeeve
The original list was pointless and completely lacking in information -- particularly the criteria used for determining the very-subjective "best." Sorry, but your response seems equally pointless.
Threaded Mode
