Quote:
Originally Posted by KSig RC
It's still effectively a poll tax - it's not so much that the amount itself is overly burdensome, but it does create awkward precedent.
Unrelated to your point, but more for the folks upstream ... comparing voting to driving or buying liquor is somewhere between silly and insane.
|
Okay, then what about comparing it to the rule now where people must show ID to take the SAT or ACT (which, incidentally, I thought was already a requirement). It is to cut down on fraud and to make the results more reliable. Which should be the reasons for requiring ID to vote.
Threaded Mode
