Quote:
Originally Posted by Munchkin03
Well, she had to get those numbers from somewhere. 
This is from the New York Daily News--hardly a hotbed of elite liberalism:
http://articles.nydailynews.com/2011...ge-gay-couples
Their projection--$184 million--is a little higher than I've heard.
My question remains--in whose "best financial interest" is it to not legalize gay marriage? The cost it would take to cover same-sex partners isn't that much more than it would be now, considering most gay households consist of dual-income earners (both of whom typically carry their own insurance). |
That's the key in your article.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/...e=domesticNews
We really don't know, but the key in this article is this.
"Parties on both sides of the issue frequently invoke the hypothetical economic impact of same-sex marriage, Leonard pointed out, so the influx of real-world data from New York could go a long way toward changing those hypotheticals into concrete facts."
Like I said, somebody smarter and
more opinionated on the counter can answer the question better than I can.
Threaded Mode
