Quote:
Originally Posted by WebGreek
The "complainer guy" won't be moving. His wife's family has owned the house for over 90 years.
|
This has literally no effect on whether anything worthy of compensation has happened, or whether/not the guy is right. There's no "golden anniversary" judicial exception.
Quote:
|
If we take his accusations at face value, he's had breakins, bulletholes in his window, urination, threats, and all kinds of other mean nasty things done to him over the years.
|
If we take his accusations at face value, there's no need for a judicial process. Come on.
Quote:
|
More to the point is that, assuming his accusations are true (and I suspect most of them are),
|
Why do you assume this? Apparently your innocuous "for discussion" question had a motive, huh?
Quote:
|
Being loud on a Friday night in a college town is one thing, but it would take something severe for him to spend many thousands of dollars on surveillance equipment, and then to put together a lawsuit.
|
Right, because you took his claims (WHICH AREN'T OUTLINED IN YOUR INITIAL ARTICLE) at face value. Also, everyone who files suit deserves compensation, right? Oh wait.
Quote:
|
Also, thanks for proofreading my writing.
|
Someone has to.
You seem to have an agenda that wasn't initially disclosed . . . any conjecture on that?
Threaded Mode
