GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > Greek Life
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Greek Life This forum is for various discussion topics regarding greek life. If you are posting a non-greek related message, please do so in one of the General Chat Topic forums.

» GC Stats
Members: 333,310
Threads: 115,750
Posts: 2,208,685
Welcome to our newest member, smuelshulzez636
» Online Users: 2,376
0 members and 2,376 guests
No Members online
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 05-22-2002, 11:06 AM
hoosier hoosier is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Now hiding from GC stalkers
Posts: 3,188
Federal law may ban Alfred action

Found this on the DKE website. I assume that some GLOs will go to the courts on this one.

"Because of congressional action last fall, Middlebury, Colby and Dartmouth may all be in legal trouble if they insist on trying to enforce their discriminatory ban on traditional Greek organizations. On Oct. 7, President Clinton signed into law the Higher Education Amendments of 1998, which included a new provision expressing the "sense of Congress" that no college that receives federal funds
should sanction (suspend, expel, etc.) any student merely for exercising the normal First Amendment right to join a private organization.

Presidents of the colleges note, correctly, that the congressional language includes no enforcement mechanism. But David Easlick, national executive director for the Delta Kappa Epsilon fraternity, makes some telling rejoinders. He notes that in earlier cases where n o direct enforcement mechanism is specified, federal courts have ruled that individuals have a right to private relief in the courts against those, like the colleges, who ignore the congressional directives. "Congressional silence does not prelude a court from implying a private right of action," wrote a Third Circuit Court in Hindes vs. F.D.I.C. in 1998. In a similar case 13 years earlier involving a group called the Student Coalition for Peace, the court had written that it "would be extremely reluctant to conclude that Congress intended to create mandatory duties but no means of enforcing them."
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.