Quote:
Originally Posted by knight_shadow
Who are you?
If you knew anything about the LGLO and MCGLO Greek movements, your ass wouldn't be talking.
|
For the last time, I am not speaking abou MCGLO, LGLO or any other GLO so stop being so danged defensive. I am talking about there being possible reasons for founding a new organization at any point in history. 2010 is no different than 1997 than 1900 than 1875. The founders of every group did so because they saw a specific need that wasn't being fulfilled at that point in time.
People have issues and needs depending on their life situations, which may or may not have anything to do with culture, religion, race, gender orientation or anything else. If someone wants to start a sorority because they seek the bonds of sisterhood with other women who are 47 year old mothers of 13 children who have three warts on their nose and live in oak trees, go for it.
We just don't know WHY the OP didn't find an organization that she felt suited her needs because she didn't give us the specifics. Her reasons may be lofty or as ridiculous as being dropped by all chapters during the recruitment process at her school. So I think it's wrong for people to categorically believe that since their organizations exist, no others may need to be founded to suit the same or other needs. The posts I was calling out were dismissive and smacked of "we're here so there's no possible reason now for ever thinking about founding any new GLO."
Threaded Mode
