Quote:
|
Originally posted by BlueandBlueHey...no real comment but I just wanted to remind you guys that a lot of people find the term "WGLO" somewhat offensive.
|
Quote:
Originally posted by LeslieAGD:
Just a side note, maybe "social GLO" would be a more PC and less offensive term than "white GLO."
|
anyhow, pm_mama00 addresses the topic of voluntary segregation on college campuses. but, and this goes back to grade school, people have ALWAYS associated themselves with people who they sense familiarity with. so, of course they are separated more from the wglos, but the same way that greeks are separated from non-greeks, athletes and non-athletes. and to that i say:
SO WHAT?
and, i really want you to go back and read then re-read, and possibly read again, ideal08's first response and pay attention to what she says about the history behind bglos.
------------------
I hope life isn't a big joke, because I don't get it.
Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way, when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes.
Maybe in order to understand mankind, we have to look at the word itself: "Mankind". Basically, it's made up of two separate words - "mank" and "ind". What do these words mean ? It's a mystery, and that's why so is mankind
[This message has been edited by MeezDiscreet (edited June 29, 2001).]
Threaded Mode