NCAA tourney expansion
the NCAA is examining the possibility of expanding the NCAA tournament. i've heard some people behave as if it was wholly unnecessary, impossible to accommodate the new teams, and minimalize the prestige of the existing tourney. i'm on the other side of that argument. and here's why:
a 96 game tournament would be fine. NCAA owns NIT, so they could just combine the two tourneys. 64 teams play, 32 byes, and it only adds one game. plus, it rewards regular season champions. what if you had a different mid-major season and conference tournament champions? tourney champ gets the automatic bid and season champ has to live or die on the bubble. 96 seems like a lot of teams, but in this format, you would only be adding one game. and what is the point of continuing the NIT as some sort of consolation prize? good NIT teams can create some real drama in the big dance. i know Luke Harangody (Notre Dame) would've created problems for a lot of teams in the NCAA tournament last year. he almost single-handedly took that game from the Cats (UK.)
|