GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 331,229
Threads: 115,703
Posts: 2,207,396
Welcome to our newest member, Davidtup
» Online Users: 3,613
0 members and 3,613 guests
No Members online
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #26  
Old 06-10-2009, 10:07 AM
KSigkid KSigkid is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 9,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin View Post
Does anyone else find it odd that so many are so hot and bothered about "diversity" on the bench, while in the same breath demand a person who went to either Harvard or Yale, has had essentially the same career since entering college as every other justice on the bench and is a Judge on one of two or three Circuits?
I don't know if this article prompted your question, but the NY Times talked about this a couple of days ago: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/09/us....html?_r=1&hpw .

I don't really have a problem with the Court being limited essentially to Ivy League grads; they're the people who most likely got the high level appellate court/Supreme Court clerkships, they're more likely to have argued before the Court, and they're more likely to get the circuit judge appointments. Do I think there's a time when we may see a Justice from somewhere like the University of Michigan Law or University of Texas Law? I think that will happen at some point. However, I have no problem with it being limited to people from the top 8-12 law schools (and I say that as someone who's at a decent school and has an ultimate dream goal to be a judge on an intermediate state appellate court).

As for the limitation on where the judges are drawn from, and being limited to a couple of circuits; I see that as more of an issue, but I see the reasons for it. If you've got a place like the 9th Circuit, which is known for throwing precedent out the window and staking itself to rather extreme legal claims, then I'm not sure they're the best people to put on the Court. There's something to say for being a creative legal mind, but there are boundaries to that. I'm a big fan of the 7th Circuit (Easterbrook, Wood, Posner, among others), and I'd like to see a judge from that court end up on SCOTUS at some point.

But, at the end of the day, the legal profession is one that can typecast you, so to speak, throughout your career. If you went to a certain school, you're more likely to get a good clerkship, get a job at a big firm or a high level government position (Office of Legal Counsel, for example), and more likely to end up as a rainmaker partner or a judge. There are exceptions of course, especially for well-connected regional schools (i.e. if you went to Suffolk Law in Boston, you have a leg up on many law students from outside of Boston), but I think, for the most part, that's just the way the profession is set up.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Madden Retiring KSigkid Entertainment 6 04-19-2009 07:51 PM
Even Chia is trying to make a buck off of Obama! SeriousSigma22 Sigma Gamma Rho 4 04-18-2009 11:20 AM
In this thread, we make up lies about what McCain or Obama has done to harm us Senusret I Chit Chat 41 10-28-2008 01:39 PM
Today's SCOTUS Decision re: public school diversity considerations shinerbock News & Politics 22 06-29-2007 11:04 PM
Bob Barker Retiring After 50 Years on TV CrimsonTide4 Entertainment 20 11-06-2006 02:34 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.