Quote:
Originally posted by shadokat
Damasa,
You said:
"In my experience on my campus, the nationals have the trouble with hazing and alcohol restrictions, and the locals are more reserved in that manner. "
Honestly, I think that's an exception rather than the norm.
|
I should have noted that it was an exception. As for norm, the majoirty of college campuses are run by nationals, agreed? Who do we hear more about in the news losing charters and being kicked off of campus due to hazing violations and or alcohol related incidents? To me, that is a norm. yet that may not be a norm to everyone
It's just hard for myself to justify that all nationals will always be better, or that a national will always be better considering we hear so much negativity about nationals and chapters going under for violations of this and violations of that.
***edited***
I'm not saying that we don't hear about locals getting kicked off campus for hazing or whatnot either, because we do, but in all honesty, it is more of an equal situation in the fact that we hear just as much about both being in trouble. So, I just it's just hard for me to justify a national to completely improve the situation on a campus like the one that carnation works on. Locals and nationals both have flaws and faults, and to think that one would be better than another can not be guaranteed.
Threaded Mode