Quote:
Originally Posted by deepimpact2
She has no basis for making an assumption that I can only speak generally and not point to anything specific.
|
Of course she does -- you have provided it.
You made a statement: "However, it is extremely unfair for people to be so judgmental about this administration when those same people tolerated an administration that basically stomped all over the constitutional rights of people in this country."
In response to that statement, she asked you a simple, specific question: "What constitutionally granted rights of people in this country do
you feel were stomped on? . . .
what specifically grinds your gears? (My emphasis.)
You answered her question, or more accurately avoided answering her question, by making the general statement that "information about that has been revealed. i thought everyone knew about that." (Really? You thought everyone knew what rights
you believe were stomped on?)
You say you pick and choose when to have a full-blown discussion and when to be general. That's fine, and that's your prerogative, without a doubt. But as I said before, you can't be surprised if, when someone asks for a specific answer and you deflect the question with generalities, the assumption is made that you really don't have a specific answer. That assumption may, in fact, be incorrect. But a reader certainly has ample basis for making the assumption.
Threaded Mode
