Gulf Coast States

[AGDee]

I've actually given a lot of thought about where I'd want to live related to which natural disasters are prevalent there. I know that's odd, but I grew up with a horrific phobia of tornadoes which has calmed down with my exposure (via the news) to hurricanes and earthquakes. This is how I rank them (worst to least worse)

1. Earthquakes: You have no notice and they devastate a huge area including much of the infrastructure (think San Francisco during the World Series in .. was it 89? 90?) Newer buildings are supposed to be earthquake proof, but since you don't know when it's coming, you don't know where you'll be so there is no way to even try to be safe.
2. Hurricanes: They can devastate a huge area but you have a lot of time to get out. If you ride it out though, there is a dilemma. They spawn tornadoes, but if you go to a good tornado shelter area in your house, you risk being flooded out. The combination of flooding and tornadoes makes it more scary. To keep safe from tornadoes, you go low, to keep safe from flooding, you go high. I don't think I'd choose to live too close to the coast, as beautiful as it is.
3. Tornadoes: They are devastating to a much smaller area, you usually have a little bit of warning to get to a sheltered area. The big difference though is the first part. In Michigan at least, when there is a tornado, it might hit houses along a mile path, but the hotels two miles away are unscathed so there is somewhere you can go if your house is destroyed. We also have basements in Michigan, so they are much less scary. I think they'd be more scary to me if I didn't have an underground shelter. If I lived in a place without an underground shelter, I'd build a safe room or I wouldn't choose to live there.
4. Flooding: I think that I would choose not to live so close to a high risk flooding area to make this one a problem. It is certainly devastating and it does seem to happen pretty quickly. I think if I lived along the Mississippi where they have been completely flooded out more than a couple times in the last decade, I'd move. The places in California that have mudslides, I'd avoid. Shoot, I'd avoid California because of the earthquake thing anyway.
5. Snow Storms: These seem like no big deal to me. They hardly ever damage your home and in places where they are frequent, we have snow plows and stuff to deal with it. We've never been "snowed in" for more than a day and it's been no big deal. It's more of a daily hassle of a few inches every day that makes driving annoying and stressful but there's relatively little damage.

So where is the ideal place to live based on this? I dunno. The mountains in North Carolina?

ETA: I'm getting really bad vibes on the Gustav thing ... not like it's the media over-hyping it, but like it's really not going to be good.