Quote:
Originally posted by 33girl
tridelta4ever - I think the real reason Mlle went belly up is they want to push Lucky (also published by Conde Nast). And even though I like Lucky, let's face it, how hard can it be to make that magazine? Buy stuff...take pictures of it...arrange it on a page. Voila!  Heck of a lot easier than paying people to write articles about which vibrator is the best on the market.
|
Awww....sadly that doesn't surprise me. I don't really like lucky that much though. It just doesn't have any of the features that make up a magazine! IT's a giant shopping advertisement! lol. And while I love shopping, I don't want it shoved in my face for 100 pages.
I agree with you on Glamour, btw. It's really improved since the settled on an editor that wasn't a freak job. It really does remind me of the Glamour of old! (well, the 80's anyway!)
Try being here in Germany....the women's magazines are a far cry from what I'm used to. Everytime I travel to London or Paris I buy up a ton of the good ones and go home and read to my hearts content! If you all get a chance to buy British Cosmo....or Company magazine, you will LOVE it!
Threaded Mode