Your thoughts on AI: discussion goes here.

[UGAalum94]

Information is on some sites GLO sites, but some folks might not know where to look and look for that info. here.

The same thing with rush and college members. Many school sits have information about dress, finances, etc, and yet, people still ask and answer here.

Some information is kept off IHQ website because it's ritual, and I think some is just left off because it would be difficult to maintain on all the chapters.

I suspect most members can tell the difference between what is ritual and what is common knowledge. When in doubt, they could ask a national officer.

Just remember that if you go with the "Is it on the national site" as a standard, you're going to really be restricted in what you can say in other forums on GreekChat as well.

For example, I don't believe my group's website (or any others group's, for that matter) addresses whether a new member who quits has to turn in all items with the letters on them when she quits. And yet, such a conversation is taking place right now in another thread. If you apply the "if it's not the webpage, it shouldn't be discussed" rule, you should be demanding that that thread be locked. You aren't. Why not?

There's a thread about "no recs," when you should write them, and who can write them.
There are several threads about affiliation with different chapters. Why would these issues fall under a different standard than AI?