Quote:
Originally Posted by sigmadiva
I agree with both comments.
I think by using the term AA, it just satisfies a broad, generalized category. There is no distinction for each individual African nation where we could be from.
...
So yes, we (AA/Blacks) should be about the business of seeking out our ancestry so that we really know where we came from in Africa, and not just settle for the white liberal's self guilt-easing term of using AA.
|
My husband has a problem with using the term African American.
For me, the fact that we can be called something that ties us to a land long lost from our ancestors.
Really we can be called something else much more derogatory and an epithet.
I do not have a problem with being called Black. However, because reference to it can be lowercased and it only refers to a polymorphism in our genes and has no biological significance.
Being tied to a land actually does have a biological significance, at least I can think of relevancy of how individuals use to live and may be currently living, i.e. nomadic vs. stationary lifestyle. Arid regions vs. tropical. Etc.
Also, I do not think it is caucasian liberal guilt were all the reasons for the African American designation. Many civil rights leaders fought a lot the governmental system to get the AA designation.
Now, I have been seeing over last few years some resentment and I am wondering where in the world these illogical concepts are coming from?