1.The point is: Larry Silverstein purchased the buildings 1,2, and 7, then finalized a massive record breaking insurance deal just six weeks prior to 9-11... - which would satisfy motive for building 7 under Dr. Jones' hypothesis... - Although, I still maintain that my qualitative speculation here should be considered independently from the physics in this matter (quantitative data):
*2. And of course, *most importantly*, the Operation Northwoods documents explain the potential motive for buildings 1 and 2, as well as somewhat building 7:
3. and... that the person who was in charge of certifying the steel in those buildings does not see any reason why those buildings should have colapsed due to fire or any type of fuel.
a hypothesis which is echoed by many others, including many engineers. Here is just one example:
PHYSICS 911 is created and maintained by a group of scientists, engineers and other professionals known collectively as the Scientific Panel Investigating Nine-eleven
Perhaps he didn't see any reason why it failed because they didn't design the building to withstand a couple of huge jet airliners crashing into it with an ass-load of jet fuel in them. I mean Jesus Christ, every structural engineer I have seen or witnessed talking about it has agreed to this point.......and frankly, I am sure as hell going to listen to extremely well respected engineers over your wack job dumbass "Dr" of physics.
Threaded Mode