Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ktsnake
Ironically, by the University asking for such a prohibition, and the organizations complying, the University might be laying out a case that might end up increasing their connection to the IFC groups, and therefore, the liability.
|
Agree 100%.
It is difficult to know for sure since it is not something one can ever ask and get a definitive answer about, but I have a feeling this is exactly why U. Texas decided to re-involve itself in the IFC sometime in the 1990s and actually put things like formal dry rush into place (though it is just open house requirements- not an actual tour of houses in groups like we did at UGA) and take more aggressive steps to discipline chapters.
I think CU's connection with the IFC will be restored in future. I hope it is. I cannot see any benefit to the divide here- but I can see dark days ahead with more deaths and alcohol incidents.
For the sake of the CU Greek System, and us all, I hope the IFC is successful in reining things in on its own. I am just worried based on how this kind of approach (and to a lesser extent than what CU is doing) fared at Texas.
Threaded Mode
