GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > Risk Management - Hazing & etc.
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Risk Management - Hazing & etc. This forum covers Risk Management topics such as: Hazing, Alcohol Abuse/Awareness, Date Rape Awareness, Eating Disorder Prevention, Liability, etc.

» GC Stats
Members: 333,873
Threads: 115,761
Posts: 2,209,033
Welcome to our newest member, zasaacdarkz1210
» Online Users: 2,131
0 members and 2,131 guests
No Members online
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17  
Old 09-05-2006, 02:15 AM
EE-BO EE-BO is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,352
It is a matter of legal realities.

The real fact of the matter is that a given fraternity chapter operating on a given piece of land- usually owned by a Housing Corporation associated with that chapter- will have the direct control over, and responsibility for, an incident that could result in a lawsuit.

But the reality is that a civil suit will typically be filed against the chapter, the University/College where it happened and the national headquarters of the fraternity.

And legal precedent shows that such organizations, especially national HQs of Greek organizations, will be held legally liable.

The theory is that nationals are supposed to set the tone for local organizations and how they are run.

The reality is that this is the "deep pockets" principle. In other words, if you want big money in a civil suit, you sue the groups that have the money and can afford to pay a judgment. And naturally, GLO HQs and Universities will tend to have more money than a local chapter.

HQ assessments for insurance are on the rise because of this. It is common for a chapter to have to pay insurance fees per active/pledge each year to nationals that equal or exceed annual active member dues.

I am not sure what exclusions exist at the national HQ level for an insurance claim, but considering the overall premium paid via annual assessments to chapters it would appear these policies cover all bases regardless of the actual cause of the incident.

Is it fair in the grand scheme of things? Not really. But it is reality, and we have to deal with it.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anti-hazing Bill Progressing in California Legislature exlurker Risk Management - Hazing & etc. 3 04-05-2006 09:31 PM
U of WY GLOs request anti-hazing bill hoosier Risk Management - Hazing & etc. 2 01-24-2006 10:40 AM
New LA Governor a KD! aopirose Kappa Delta 1 11-17-2003 07:20 PM
Proposed bill seeks to criminalize hazing moe.ron Risk Management - Hazing & etc. 15 10-24-2003 01:15 PM
Ladies and Gentleman, The Governor of California moe.ron News & Politics 9 08-24-2003 11:57 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.