Quote:
Originally Posted by RACooper
Ah yes the UN Security Council dropped the language stating that it was an intentional or dileberate attack, as well as making any condemnation at the insistance of the US... I gotta say I'm ever so surprised that the US would take an anti-UN pro-Israel stance
Fair enough Rudey - please point out the number of times, and casualties, that Hezbollah (the "evil terrorists") has attacked a UN post... as say opposed to the number of times the Israelis (the "good guys") have done so...
When you wrap your mind around that - then you might understand why I condemn the "good guys" for yet again F-cking attacking the UN
Oh and nice to see that the IDF has refused any interviews or information to be forthcoming in the UN investivgation (again)... but it's going to be bloody hard to explain how Israel "accidently" dropped 3 laser-guided "bunker-buster
bombs... hopefully this time the IDF won't escape charges for a war-crime.
I'm sure the airforce folks on the site might be able to shed light on how improbible it is to claim this attack as "accidental" given the facts emerging.
|
Rob it's good to know that Annan accepts that it wasn't intentional and is satisfied with an investigation while you are an armchair general that can provide expert advice with your limited skill set and condemn a country from the beginning. It's great that you can't come up with a single reason as to why they would do it also.
Oh and Rob, it's amazing that you don't comprehend something so simple as terrorists in Lebanon using human shields including the UN to protect themselves and cause PR damage while knowing they can kill anyone in Israel and it would be fine. Really, it's great.
-Rudey