Quote:
Originally Posted by sigepsal
the bmp was introduced to sigma phi epsilon in the wrong manner. 'forcing' chapters to convert or get shut down was the worst thing the national chapter could possibly do. because with that, the bmp came with negative connotations that have stuck.
|
Well I agreed with ONE thing you said. Well put. You make an excellent, and unheard, point. Now what to do about it?! Any bright ideas?
Your rant also failed to address other things like "Why are BMP chapters suck stuck-up dicks?" (not always, but very often)
You said BMP demolishes small cliques like "pledgeclasses." Those are not cliques (or clickes are you so "eloquently" misspelled it) nor are they SMALL. I'd hardly say 30+ guys is a small clique. They are gentleman, often of the same age, who help one another through the process thus forming life-long bonds -simliar to what they will hold with the rest of the fraternity. Yeah... you go erradicate those... good thinking.
Quote:
but to say that other fraternities think we are less because of it is ridiculous
|
This is not ridiculous. Go talk to fraternities at UGA, or Richmond and ask what they think about SigEp. Better yet, ask some sorority girls.
Quote:
the balanced man ideal is the next step. it is not a coincidence that tons of other fraternities have copied this model and applied it accordingly.
|
Like who??? Cite some examples! (You didn't ever work for Enron, did you?)
It would really suck if my beloved fraternity got the National repuation equivalent to that of someone like TKE.