|
Where are these active undergraduate sorority women that are such teetotalers (sp?) and so afraid of being molested at every event they:
1. Need to pass rules saying they can't be in a specific Fraternity house enmasse that has alcohol present.
2. Go to Fraternity houses anyway? I guess to desensitize themselves to the fear of sexual assault?
I also I like the implication that someone is taking a gun out and pressuring them to drink? Or that "mauling" is even common? I mean if mauling is common and almost accepted at a lot of chapters than some of us are attending the wrong schools and are missing out.
I have met active undergrad sorority women from all over the country and most seem a bit mature and sophistictated than the "prey animals" these types of resolutions portray them to be. The have handled themselves as people of social savvy often ahead of their peers, and most that I have met on the undergrad level don't particurly like the Resolutions. But they do FEAR their National taking their charter from them. Not a state I would find comfortable in an organization. So some comply and most do not.
As far as Panhell making harsher rules they do. I know some administrators in some major Greek systems and they have said the rules were made at their behest. This makes you wonder who the various panhell members on a campus are representing, the administrations desire to be tough on alcohol, or their sisters' rights to be treated the same as other undergrads.
IFC's and Panhell's have traditionally been the enforcement punishment arm of the administration . . . but that's a whole nother post bemoaning the stupidity of people.
|
Threaded Mode