Quote:
Originally posted by DeltAlum
Mine is simply that nobody knows what the totality of the evidence is and we probably aren't wise to decide either way with the very limited knowledge we have.
|
Yours, then, is quite simply wrong.
The rule is clear: the onus is on the prosecution to prove the case, and the defendants (who have not yet even been charged) operate under the presumption of innocence.
There is no need to 'decide either way' if there's limited evidence - it's pretty clear which 'way' you should 'decide' . . .
Threaded Mode