Why, six years ago, did the CIA give the Iranians blueprints to build a bomb?

Rudey · #31 01-12-2006, 01:13 PM

You know there are liberal intellectuals that make effective arguments. Paul Krugman could convince you that the world is flat if he wanted to. The New Republic also has a lot of writers like that. Sometimes Daily Kos carries work that isn't rubbish.

At no times do those people create an article with links. That is what you do. I am not going to spend hours reading this just to respond to you. I opened them only to find half of them don't work and the other half are about Iraq. You are obviously out only to post links and spread BS.

As for the issue of arming both sides, it's something every nation has done. Right now, Iran is incredibly advanced in its nuclear technology because of China, Russia, and Pakistan. Those are the nations in the spotlight right now. So stop with the jibberish and go respond to comments on blogs instead of filling a website that isn't receptive to you with your jibberish.

-Rudey

Quote:

Originally posted by positive14
Here's my claim:

The US and the UK continually arm the states and organizations that we eventually deem to be our enemies.

Here's the evidence:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,73292,00.html

http://www.sfbg.com/News/32/21/Features/iraq.html

http://foi.missouri.edu/terrorbkgd/following.html

http://abcnews.go.com/sections/nigh...y_1_020917.html

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/index.htm

http://www.guardian.co.uk/iran/stor...1678220,00.html

http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/51/220.html

http://www.sptimes.com/2003/03/16/P...lt_its_we.shtml

I left out the London Gaurdian Story because you don't like alligation (however credible),

*IMPORTANT*
Having said that.... that article in NO WAY changes the validity of my claim OR... the validity of the other sources I use... or the thousands of others that are available if you took the time to find them.