I appreciate those who are, at the very least, open to what I have to say.
Take a close look at the manner in which WTC 7 collapses straight down imploding (with squibs, and a classic crimp, almost at the rate of free fall) just like any other prefect demolition, vertically onto its own footprint.
The claim that the collapse was the result of a fire or diesel (a low temperature fuel) requires the fire be hot enough to melt huge steel columns equally distributed throughout the entire building, providing equal heat for an equal amount of time, so that all the load bearings members would fail at the exact same moment.
The fires were visibly minimal at the time of collapse.
I agree with the hypothesis of Dr. Jones, and I am happy that his paper has just been accepted to be peer reviewed.
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html
Threaded Mode