I wasn't there, but my understanding would be that the atmosphere of the meeting would not have been actually very fair or proportional to what happened. If they walked into an extremely hostile environment what incentive is there for them to stay? To play the victim so that other people could feel better about themselves?
I am sure they would have stayed in any logical rational discussion.
Quote:
Originally posted by KEPike
We can read the thread to see the debate about constitutionality and all that, but really what this comes down to is tolerance. Is a lack of tolerance on the Pikes part cause for charter removal? Probably not. Does it show a huge amount of immaturity and unwillingness to work for a better resolution? Definitely.
|
Threaded Mode