Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin
That statement is weak as hell. Because Christian didn't follow an internal grievance process governed by an institution which had already displayed a strong bias against him, that's reason to cast aspersions?
They would've been better off saying that they can't comment due to privacy laws and left it at that.
|
I'm always wary of prepared statements that use terms like "absolutely outrageous" as well - such hollow, non-specific yet inflammatory-sounding rhetoric seems to be out of a playbook, rather than something that addresses a situation in a meaningful manner.
Relying on "the process" is almost never enough - and juries will keep awarding dollars until that lesson is learned.
Threaded Mode
